It’s an exciting time to be in the market for a new GPU, with several new products on the market in the last 12 months. Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. Recently, however, AMD has started phasing out the later in … ASUS ROG Zephyrus G14 Vs Apple MacBook Pro: Which is Better? HITMAN 2 was tested using the built in benchmark with ultra settings, and we were seeing almost a 37% improvement with the 1660 Ti at both 1080p and 1440p. We can’t call the Radeon RX 5500 XT a bad deal. AMD also offers a feature called Game Boost, which monitors your framerate and dynamically adjusts the resolution of your games when it won’t impact the visual experience to maximize performance. (Detailed Comparison). Competent 60 fps 1080p performance. 65 points. Dell Inspiron 15 7591 vs Inspiron 15 7590: Which One is Better to Buy? However, for just a few dollars more you can get better gaming performance from a GeForce GTX 1660. Interestingly, the Zotac GeForce GTX 1660 peaked around 100w in our Furmark stress test, whereas the Gigabyte sample drew around 130w for this test. Grafik kartı oyun performansını 57 oyunlarda ve 1080p, 1440p ve 4K'deki Ultra, High, Medium ve Low kalite ayarlarında karşılaştırın. For several generations, the Radeon team has focused its attention on mainstream cards like the RX 480, 580, and 590 (all based on the same Polaris architecture). RX 5500 XT 8GB karşı GTX 1660 performans karşılaştırması. Here is a short and precise comparison between these cards based on their specifications, performance, features, power consumption, and pricing. Units. According to Igor's calculations, the GTX 1660 SUPER will be 2.8% faster than the AMD RX 500 XT and 4.3% slower than the GTX 1660 Ti. Ansel even supports RAW EXR output, which allows you to make changes to the image in post-processing, such as create HDR-enhanced images. 70 points. It even offers integrated media capture and game streaming features, including screenshots, video, and instant gif capture as well as compatibility with many popular streaming services such as Twitch, YouTube, Mixer, Facebook and more. We have the dual X cooling which obviously involves two fans. Now letâs take a look at the benchmark results. Strangely, the RX 5500 XT is a stronger competitor with medium settings, but why would you settle for medium if you don’t need to? Nvidia does provide a larger 192-bit memory bus versus AMD’s 128-bit memory bus configuration, but the faster memory more than makes up for the difference in bus size. It is made from plastic, so it won’t aid in cooling. New York, Based on 125,841 user benchmarks for the AMD RX 5500 and the Nvidia GTX 1660, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 651 GPUs. Compare hashrate, power consumption, and profitability of different hardware. AMD RX 590 vs Nvidia GTX 1060: Which One is Better? 66 $ 399. In practice, the Radeon GPUs actually draw quite a bit less than 130 watts, except under extreme loads. You will receive a verification email shortly. Legal Disclaimer And Affiliate Disclaimer. Also, Radeon Image Sharpening combines contrast-adaptive sharpening with GPU upscaling to produce crisper in-game visuals. Despite this the 5500 XT was almost averaging 50 FPS in this test at 1440p. x. The GTX 1660 Super has a launch price of just $230 USD with comparable performance to the $280 USD 1660 Ti. The Radeon RX 5500 XT also supports a technology called Radeon Anti-Lag, which aims to reduce input lag by managing the queue of work sent to the CPU and ensuring that the CPU can’t get ahead of the GPU. Multi pools. Shadow of the Tomb Raider was also tested using the built in benchmark with high settings. The GTX 1650 Super was launched recently as AMD was claiming "the RX 5500 beats the GTX 1650." This is likely the same PCB used by the dual fan models. Both AMD and Nvidia offer compelling feature sets for their budget-minded options. Specs. The system also has Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 memoryÂ and is running Windows 10 with all updates to date applied. Home > Graphics card comparison > AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC Ultra Gaming. There was a problem. At 1080p the 5500 XT was 6% ahead of the 1660 Ti, and then 8% ahead at 1440p. So the results at 1440p would be different. At 1440p we see similar margins, the 5500 XT is still on par with the GTX 1660 … Our Gigabyte RX 5500 XT OC 8G proved to be one of the coolest-running GPUs that we’ve seen in this segment. Nvidia’s configuration appears much more capable of handling games with maximum graphics settings enabled than AMD’s. At 1080p weâre looking at a 4% improvement to average frame rate, increasing to 18% higher once we turn the resolution up to 1440p. As for the differences, at 1080p the 1660 Ti was 26% ahead in average FPS and 27% at 1440p. But for this comparison, we’re focusing on the 8GB version. IMHO the 5500 XT is a bit overpriced, but they seem to have decent headroom. Our tests with Gigabyte’s GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G showed that it peaked at a 68C. NVENC allows the CPU to send a single set of instructions to the GPU, which the GPU uses to output to your display and broadcast without impeding performance. Let’s find out. However, the GTX 1660 fell just a sliver short with an average framerate of 58.7 fps on max settings. Dell Inspiron 15 (7590) vs XPS 15 (7590): Which One Will Be Better? Initially, the 8GB variant was priced the same as the GeForce GTX 1660, making it a hard pass, while the 4GB model costed the same as the GTX 1650 Super. Visit our corporate site. With alerts. Hardware. FAR CRY PRIMAL was tested using the built in benchmark with ultra settings, and once again the 1660 Ti was coming out ahead. As a result, the TU116-300-A1 is nearly twice the size of NAVI 14 XTX at 284 mm². Winner: AMD. AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT vs RX 580: Which Should You Get? Similarly-priced Radeon RX Vega 56 is faster. What a difference a year can make. However, RX 5500 XT and GTX 1660 are not far behind and have power consumption figures of 130W and 120W respectively. This generally results in better performance than a similar, single-GPU graphics card. The RX 5500 XT also offers faster GDDR6 memory compared to the GTX 1660’s GDDR5 memory modules. Specs. In fact, in terms of dimensions they are identical though under the skin they are also quite different. And Nvidia had not yet launched the RT and Tensor core-free 16-series Turing GPUs for the mid-range market. The length of the card is 230 millimeters, width is 108 millimeters, and height is 40 millimeters. The backside of the card we do find a full-length backplate. Like most areas of PC tech, price cuts and new products are always coming along to change the battle for your hard-earned component dollars. Following three passes of our Metro: Exodus test, the data showed that the GPU never exceeded 63C. 66. We tested two examples of the RX 5500 XT, a 4GB Sapphire and an 8GB Gigabyte card, and we found that, in-game, the AMD card will average close to 100w. Samsung Galaxy S20+ Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max: Which is Better Option? GTA 5 was tested using the replay feature with the exact same replay at ultra settings. I am using SAPPHIRE PULSE RX 5500 XT 8GB in this review. Where the Radeon maybe 5% to 10% cheaper, it’s also 5% to 10% slower in many cases. If you compare these cards at the same price, the GeForce GTX 1660 is the clear winner. Currency. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 Gaming X Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB The graphics card contains two graphics processing units (GPUs). Both the Gigabyte and Sapphire Radeon cards topped 120w in this test, with the Sapphire model touching 136w at its peak. However, Nvidia’s GeForce GTX 1660, which hit store shelves in March of 2019, is a strong contender for your gaming money. In practice, the Radeon GPUs actually draw quite a … And as for performance, both AMD and Nvidia offer dynamic clock speed boosting technologies that automatically overclock your GPU to maximize the capabilities of your hardware configuration. The company’s Radeon Software allows you to monitor your GPU’s temperature, fan speed and voltage, adjust the graphics settings for your games, access performance reports and game states, and update your GPU drivers. The Witcher 3 was tested with Hairworks disabled, and like most other games was playable at both 1080p and 1440p even with ultra settings in use. Coming in with a $229 price. Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. RX 5500 XT vs GTX 1660 Super. So if you’re reading this in the weeks and months after first publication (in mid-January 2020), make sure to check your favorite online store to see if the value balance has shifted -- or if something better has come along. With alerts. Release date October 2019. The last time we did a showdown of the mid-range GPUs, we put the Radeon RX 590 toe to toe with the GeForce GTX 1060 and AMD’s card was the definitive winner. The system that I’m testing in has an Intel Core i7-8700K. Theoretically, the NAVI 14 XTX has 224 GB/s of memory bandwidth to work with, compared to the 192 GB/s that TU116 offers. USD/kWh. Nvidia’s offering outperforms the competition handily in gaming tests, which if we’re honest is kind of the point of a graphics card—especially in the $200 range. At 1080p the 1660 Ti was giving us 20% higher average frame rate, and 24% higher at 1440p. The price-performance of the GTX 1650 Super disturbs the GTX 1660, and so NVIDIA launched the GTX 1650 Super, possibly to preempt the "RX 5500 XT," which it thought … The Radeon RX 5500 XT is available in 4GB and 8GB configurations. 4GB variant is notably slower in certain titles. None of the GPUs of this calibre draw anywhere near enough power to make a significant difference in your system’s configuration. Battlefield 5 was tested in campaign mode rather than multiplayer, as itâs easier to consistently reproduce the test run. Release date January 2020. It’s far and away a better card than you would have bought for the same price a year ago. I found both cards to deliver a fairly playable experience with ultra settings, even with 1440p, however the 1660 Ti was getting 15% higher average FPS here, and 9% higher at 1080p. Reward calculation Filter. You likely won’t be concerned with the power requirements for these cards, but higher power draw does equate to higher heat output, which is likely of higher concern to you. BTR received a Sapphire Pulse RX 5500 XT OC 4GB ($169) review sample from AMD on Monday, and we benchmarked it using 46 games versus the RX 570 4GB, the RX 590 8GB and versus the GTX 1660 6GB (non-Super). USD/kWh. The Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1660 sample that we tested in March 2019 needed an average of 126 watts, and peaked at 134 watts, and the Zotac model that we used in the Radeon RX 5500 XT review pulled between 110 and 120 watts in our Metro: Exodus power test. More demanding titles such as Borderlands 3 and Metro: Exodus, we had to drop the settings to medium to achieve the coveted bare minimum of 60 fps.